Connect with us
'The Omen' (2006) review: Is this remake worth a (Halloween) viewing?

31 Days of Halloween

‘The Omen’ (2006) review: Is this remake worth a (Halloween) viewing?

Does this remake stand the test of time?

Welcome to another installment of 31 Days of Halloween! This is our chance to set the mood for the spookiest and scariest month of the year as we focus our attention on horror and Halloween fun. For the month of October we’ll be sharing various pieces of underappreciated scary books, comics, movies, and television to help keep you terrified and entertained all the way up to Halloween.

Listen to the latest episode of our weekly movies podcast, Adventures in Movies!

I do love horror films with a juicy plot… and make no mistake, The Omen has just about the juiciest plot a horror film could have. The plot and how the mystery of it all is revealed over time is the best aspect of this remake. Well that and the cinematography. It’s so awful of me but I actually have never gotten around to seeing the original… I need to fix that, I know. But because I haven’t seen the 70’s original, this review will be solely focused on this film, without any comparison to the first. 

The biggest weakness here is the first quarter where things take a bit to get going and become engaging. I always believe that it should be one of the priorities of any film to grab its audience somehow at the beginning and not take a while to interest them. With this film, you have to wait about 30 minutes or so for things to really get going.

The other weakness is that Julia Stiles and Liev Schrieber take a bit to find their groove, like the overall film. At first, they just don’t gel very well. But thankfully as the film goes on, we see better from them both.

That’s really the only complaints I have and while they don’t completely annihilate the film, they do keep it from reaching its full potential. Where this film succeeds is after that first 30 or 40 minutes. I enjoyed seeing the different pieces of the puzzle present themselves and seeing them come together. This isn’t a horror film where there’s one generic villain and everything is just run of the mill.

See the source image

There are multiple scenes that incorporate unique intriguing imagery (sometimes included in visions or dreams) and I always appreciate some unique attention grabbing visuals. Things really ramp up in the second half and what I see as the film’s strongest aspects occur.

When Schrieber’s character starts to finally piece things together and sets out on a mission to discover what’s really happening is when the film is at its best. There are some truly horrifying discoveries and I found these discoveries to be so chilling and interesting, big props to the writers. Those who’ve seen the film will know what I’m talking about – the cemetery scene is so well done and fresh.

What happens in the cemetery is chilling and is an example of good writing. I really love it when a horror film not only scares but also has a chilling story to tell, and this film does that. THIS is the films biggest success – telling a chilling, interesting story about this prophecy being fulfilled and the ways in which certain evil operatives make sure it’s fulfilled. Another success is the incredible cinematography. The visuals and direction in so many scenes are just so great – obvious talent.

See the source image

There are a couple scenes in particular in which I was simply amazed by the striking color and crispness of the shots. These scenes make great use of the rich locations and feature beautiful slow snowfall. Having a director and cinematographer who know what they’re doing and are capable of delivering this kind of work is crucial in film. Slow motion is utilized very well in several scenes too.

The best performance is given by Mia Farrow. Mia Farrow seems to like being in Satanic horror films… and I’m not complaining because she does so well in them! She gives a very calm understated performance as the family nanny. Her performance needed to be calm and welcoming and she succeeds in doing that, but this isn’t surprising considering how good of an actress she is.

Julia Stiles gets better as the film goes along. I really liked Stiles in the second half of the film where she has more dramatic material to sink her teeth into, but I will say that in the beginning she struggles to find her footing. As for Liev Schrieber, he mostly does a fine job, he is a talented actor and shows that in his leading role here.

See the source image

The Omen (2006) is an overall pretty good film in my opinion. Is it great? No. Does it make mistakes? For sure. But I don’t believe it deserved the largely negative critical reception it got at it’s release.

'The Omen' (2006) review: Is this remake worth a (Halloween) viewing?
‘The Omen’ (2006) review: Is this remake worth a (Halloween) viewing?
The Omen (2006)
The Omen (2006) is an overall good film due to it's interesting storytelling and it's excellent cinematography.
Reader Rating0 Votes
0
Interesting storytelling
Striking cinematography
Mia Farrow
First half hour struggles to grab the audience
Stiles and Schrieber struggle in the beginning to find their footing
6.5
Good
Buy Now
Comments

In Case You Missed It

'Batman: White Knight Presents: Harley Quinn' #1 review 'Batman: White Knight Presents: Harley Quinn' #1 review

‘Batman: White Knight Presents: Harley Quinn’ #1 review

Comic Books

AfterShock Preview: I Breathed a Body #1 AfterShock Preview: I Breathed a Body #1

AfterShock Preview: I Breathed a Body #1

Comic Books

Lovecraft Country (HBO) Lovecraft Country (HBO)

‘Lovecraft Country’ episode 10 ‘Full Circle’ recap/review

Television

Marvel Unlimited 2020 Marvel Unlimited 2020

Marvel Comics expands Marvel Unlimited to feature new comics 3 months after print

Comic Books

Connect
Newsletter Signup